by Phil Johnson
tarting tomorrow, and for the coming week, we're honoring brevity. For an explanation (and the rules), search the comments here for the words "here's the challenge."
Amazon also has it. See details at Kress
Also available at Logos
Available on Kindle and in Logos
View readers' favorite Kindle excerpts
|
Remember that you are our guests. We will, at our discretion, delete comments that we find off-topic, derailing, un-civil, slanderous, trollish or troll-feeding, petulant, pestiferous, and/or otherwise obnoxious and non-constructive. If we warn you, stop it. After no more than three warnings, you will find yourself banned, and all your future comments will be immediately deleted.
See an error in the post? How clever of you! Email the author. If you comment a correction, expect the comment to disappear with the error.
If you are confused about how the specifics of these principles play out in practical terms, you'll find a longer list of rules HERE.
 |
| The opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily represent the views of all contributors. Each individual is responsible for the facts and opinions contained in his posts. Generally, we agree. But not always. |
18 comments:
ok
Yay!
Delivering as promised! Awesome.
I want to register a complaint.
A post under 50 words.
I am female
Terribly discriminatory.
I may try....
And remember, not only brevity, but also clarity, certainty, and above all, authoritative.
We want to cause as many cases of hives as possible.
Cool!
I
like
the
idea.
This should be suspenseful. Looking forward to the week. Can't wait for the outcome.
I’m glad you are being sensitive to the ADHD crowd.
Pithy Pyro Posting presents pluriaxial possibilities.
great! Frank has the Hiatus advantage, he should be given a penalty.
Also, my blog received an R rating
This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:
abortion (5x) hell (2x) torture (1x)
Proud of my R
al sends
Al:
Yeah, I was kind of surprised we didn't get at least a PG, because of the intensity of all the violence around here (meat chubs, sarcasm, our disagreements with postmodernism, our refusal to march to the drum of post-evangelicalism, and whatnot).
Apparently the ratings system is just a relic of modernity.
My blog came up "G" also, as did AOMIN. BHT came up PG-13. There was apparently no nudity or gore.
Ahhhh yes, but can (will) commentors respond in kind??? THAT is the question!
Looking forward to this unique time of posting from the Pyros!
Phil, With all this talk of love I believe your G rating is safe...
Which reminds me... I think this series will sit well with emergent crowd, but the hardshell Baptists are not going to be happy. The upside (aside from the content itself)... depending on their response this may open up a whole new series of posters.
al sends
My blog (the real one, not the periferal ones listed in this blogger profile) came up PG because it contained the words "missionary" and "dead". Go figure.
My blog rated a G. The words flagged were "dead" and "death." I am stunned. I was expecting at least a PG-13 due to my rather blunt, politically incorrect manner of writing.
This is going to completely ruin my reputation.
Fide-o gets a PG because of "death" and "hell." Go figure.
Post a Comment