hen it comes to the matter of "social justice"—a term I personally disavow but will use for the sake of this commentary—Lev. 19:15-18 is one of the most comprehensive passages in all of Scripture.
It reads:
You shall do no injustice in judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor nor defer to the great, but you are to judge your neighbor fairly. You shall not go about as a slanderer among your people, and you are not to act against the life of your neighbor; I am the Lord. You shall not hate your fellow countryman in your heart; you may surely reprove your neighbor, but shall not incur sin because of him. You shall not take vengeance nor bear any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.When properly understood, particularly against the seemingly ubiquitous backdrop of the current infringement of the "social gospel" on the evangelical church we, as believers in the one true God (Jn. 17:3), realize that there is no category of person, whether believer or an unbeliever, to which the precepts established in the above-mentioned passage do not apply with regard to the universal principle of the imago Dei (Gen. 1:27).
In other words, notwithstanding the ever-expanding vocabulary of hyphenated descriptors and subjective personal identifiers that permeate much of the language of social justicians today, those whose hearts and minds have been regenerated by the power of the gospel (Rom. 1:16, 12:2; 1 Thess. 2:13) understand that such aesthetic qualifiers are wholly unnecessary, as every human being—by virtue of having been created in the image of God by God Himself (Jn. 1:3)—is inherently worthy of being treated equitably without regard to ethnicity, sex, or socio-economic station.
" . . .have you not made distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil motives?" (Jas. 2:4).
But in observing the contemporary social gospel movement today, particularly within Protestant evangelicalism, I find it to be one that continues to evolve yet never matures.
Despite the seemingly incessant string of racial reconciliation and social justice conversations, roundtables, summits, and conferences being conducted and facilitated by various evangelical churches and entities, the fact is not much has changed in terms of their core objective: that sinful human beings consistently treat one another as God has commanded us in His Word (Ps. 106:3; Prov. 21:15; Zech. 7:9). But this begs the question: what part of "sinful" do these beloved brothers and sisters not understand?
Admittedly, I pose that question with just a hint of sarcasm, but only because it is believers who, more than anyone, should be ever-mindful that sin—our sin—permeates and encompasses every facet of our existence in this world, including our relationships and interactions with one another, but who seem to so quickly consign that reality to oblivion when confronted with the injustices and inequities this world presents, as if they were somehow behavioral anomalies (Jn. 16:33). Or, to state it differently, why should we, as Christians, expect anyone's behavior to change whose heart has not first been changed (Rom. 12:1-2; 1 Cor. 6:11)?
In asking that question, I am reminded of the words of the 17th-century Puritan theologian, Thomas Watson who, in The Doctrine of Repentance, asks soberingly: "Is it not strange that two should live together, and eat and drink together, yet not know each other? Such is the case of a sinner. His body and soul live together, work together, yet he is unacquainted with himself. He knows not his own heart, nor what a hell he carries about him. Under a veil a deformed face is hid. Persons are veiled over with ignorance and self-love; therefore they see not what deformed souls they have."
In recent months, I have been privileged to have been asked to participate in several discussion forums on the topic of social justice. I have declined the vast majority of those invitations because, simply put, God has already spoken on the issue.
So what more is there to be said?
Do you want more laws enacted so sinful people can break those laws as well as the ones they're already breaking (Rom. 7:14-20)? Do you desire that unethical politicians resign or be impeached only to be replaced by other unethical politicians who will mimic their transgressions (Eccl. 5:8)? Do you want sinful police officers fired only so they can be replaced with other sinful police officers? Because we've all sinned (Eccl. 7:20; Rom. 3:23)?
My point is there is nothing you or I can say on the matter of "social justice" that would heighten or strengthen or make more authoritative what an omniscient, almighty, and sovereign God has not already declared. As the prophet Micah declared, "He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, love kindness, and to walk humbly before your God (Mic. 6:8)?
An interesting thing about Micah 6:8 is that it is a favorite text of many evangelical social justicians. They particularly regard the middle portion of that passage—"to do justice"—as being especially integral to their apologetic that social justice is in fact a "gospel issue" (whatever that means). But it is in the same spirit in which God spoke to His people through Micah regarding our practicing justice, kindness, and humility that He speaks to us today in other areas of our life.
Consider also that:
- He has told you, O husband, that you are to love your wife: Eph. 5:25-33a; 1 Pet. 3:7.
- He has told you, O wife, that you are to respect your husband: Eph. 5:33b; 1 Pet. 3:1-3.
- He has told you, O child, that you are to honor and obey your parents: Ex. 20:12; Eph. 6:1-3.
- He has told you, O employee, how to conduct yourself on your job: Col. 3:23.
- He has told you, O leader, how to guide others with humility: Matt. 20:25-28.
He has spoken not only on matters of justice and injustice, but also on marriage, parenting, leadership, work, finances, abortion, and others. Yes, God has spoken. And since He has spoken, it is our responsibility as believers, as did the prophet Micah in his day, to proclaim His word to a sin-saturated world, knowing that, in God's sovereign providence, there will be those who, upon hearing the truth of the gospel, will respond in obedience and those who will not, for such is the nature of the human heart (Matt. 13:18-23; Mk. 7:17-23).
"Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances" (Ezek. 36:26-27, NASB)
Humbly in Christ,
5 comments:
Thank you, Darrell. I've been reading your various blog posts through much of today and have found them most helpful. I appreciate how you write with such clarity and insight. You've given me much to think about.
What the advocates of "social justice" and thereby a "social gospel" fail to grasp is that the leitmotif of the Gospel DOES NOT concern the litigation of "social justice" but rather the preeminence and propitiation of Divine Justice. Even in the event that all the world could enjoy the mythology of a social harmony, the axiom still remains that the world is unjust before an absolutely just and righteous Sovereign. The Apostle Paul summates it best: "For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us." Romans 8:3-4
There's two kinds of justice that seem to be conflated by the social justice as Gospel advocates: Civil justice and God's justice. These distinctions are clearly at play in the passages here. God commands us to practice righteous civil justice, but satisfies his justice toward us with grace. If we received God's justice, we would all spend an eternity in hell. We don't want God's justice. We are grateful to have his grace. The practice of righteous civil justice is the outworking of that grace.
What I've noticed in spending some time in various places overseas in short-term missions is that we must often be willingly subject to civil injustice in order to proclaim God's grace. This was Paul's example and admonition as well. We all want civil justice. It's just not the Gospel. We all must be prepared to endure civil injustice without complaint, while personally practicing civil justice graciously, all for the sake of the Gospel.
Brilliant as always, my friend!
How should a Christian who is black think about the circumstance when a fellow brother in Christ (in their own local church) who is white says something fairly offensive re: race. Now, that is very vague and subjective so please, for the sake of teaching, let us say that the white fellow did say something based on old stereotypes and the black fellow is not completely paranoid. Should the black fellow try to point out the issue to his brother? Nothing I've read in these Pyromaniacs posts on "social justice" is meant to stifle Christians of color speaking to others, in love, in a local church when these things come up, correct?
Post a Comment